28 September 2009
Until we can be certain that we have a prostate cancer test that has a good level of accuracy for everyone, we should remain apprehensive about rolling out population-wide screening. ![]()
Dr Karen Woo, associate medical director for Bupa
The long-standing debate over whether or not the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test should be used to screen for prostate cancer continues on after a new study questioning its sensitivity is published.
The study, published in the BMJ, examined the sensitivity of the PSA test as a screening tool for prostate cancer in over 1,500 Swedish men. Although the test could indicate prostate cancer, the researchers concluded that it was not sensitive enough to be used as a screening test.
For a test to be used to screen for a disease, it must be able to give specific values that can accurately say if a disease is present or not. The researchers found that the PSA test was unable to give precise enough cut-off values needed before a screening test can be introduced in a given population.
Screening tests that aren't sensitive enough can result in people being mistakenly diagnosed and treated for a condition they do not have, or their condition may go undiagnosed. This can cause serious physical and emotional distress.
Bupa's associate medical director, Dr Karen Woo, said: "Until we can be certain that we have a prostate cancer test that has a good level of accuracy for everyone, we should remain apprehensive about rolling out population-wide screening.
"This research has identified potential flaws in the PSA test. This questions its accuracy as a screening tool, but not as a diagnostic tool. The PSA test remains instrumental in helping doctors diagnose, monitor and decide on treatments for men with prostate cancer."
| Key facts |
|---|
|
Holmstrom, B. et al. (2009), "Prostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer: longitudinal study", BMJ 2009;339:b3537 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3537
Back to the latest health news